I've been a dormant and sporadic listener for some time now, but the little seed planted the very first time I heard you all has taken root!  

Before reading your post, I spoke with them as they are used to doing Subject To deals and they said that the policy holder would switch to my entity name with the mortgagor's name as secondary - I am interested to see what their feedback is with your suggestion -- as your approach seems to send less "red flags".

I always tell clients that if a bank is throwing up a red flag over some issue relevant to you as the investor, or over the deal itself, then there is real risk that should at least give you pause.

They finance large multi-family properties with very attractive terms, albeit you'll have more red tape...

Red text is not necessarily negative). 

After driving by this FSBO (classic red and white sign in the yard) 15-20 times on my way to the jobsite, we finally looked into it and saw it was a double.

Zoning change status is required or it can be red -tagged.

@Chandra Minter offering seller financing in this stage of the market cycle (when assets sell easily) is a red flag.

However, housing WHERE you want it, HOW you want it, and at a price YOU want to pay, well that's goes far beyond a "right".There have been many many solutions presented to improve housing affordability, like revamping our asinine building codes, reducing the cost of litigation, rewriting insanely punitive legislation such as the CRLTO, providing tax credits or reducing taxes, and increasing subsidies while reducing the red-tape associated with using those subsidies.

I was thinking that would throw up a red flag somewhere.