This is a great site to learn and network.Regarding your "belief" that it is too expensive to invest in CT...

Of course, there is a correlation between single and unfit, but I've seen no evidence of causation.Personally, I think it's cheaper to pay for someone's abortion than to pay to raise their kids, so I'd love the government offer to pay to abort and save taxpayer dollars down the road.Unfortunately, the religious right in this country would rather have unfit mothers raising welfare children than to encourage abortion, so that won't ever happen.

I'll start off by taking the stance that, while I disagree with gay marriage, my conservative beliefs tell me that each individual should have the right to do whatever they want.

Given that belief, YOU should be a politician...

I'm not concerned with respect to a deficiency resulting in a 1099-C, as a seller is protected against either via the Mortgage Debt Relief Act (owner-occ) or via insolvency (non-owner occ), although educating and convincing a misinformed lay person or realtor can be quite a challenge on the tax forgiveness issue as well.Another frequent objection from sellers and agents alike is that because my offer is so low, it will create an unecessary delay when they're of the belief the bank will most likely deny a "lowball" investor offer in the end - and all those weeks or months in which an offer at or close to market value could've been accepted were forfeited in vain.

That said, I don't have any data on-hand to support that belief...it's more a gut instinct based on previous data I've read.

I simply do not have a lot of time available and therefore want to gather the knowledge as quickly as possible so I can get on with building some wealth.It is my hope and belief that having a packaged study course will give me the knowledge quicker than I could obtain the knowledge through other means.

I copied the relevant section from Ohio law below For purposes of the immunity created by division (B)(1) of this section, reasonably necessary force to repel a trespasser from a building or other structure that is maintained as a permanent or temporary dwelling or to prevent a trespasser from making an unlawful entry into a building or other structure of that nature may include the taking of or attempting to take the trespasser’s life, or causing or attempting to cause physical harm or serious physical harm to the person of the trespasser, if the owner, lessee, or renter of real property or a member of the owner’s, lessee’s, or renter’s family who resides on the property has a reasonable good faith belief that the owner, lessee, or renter or a member of the owner’s, lessee’s, or renter’s family is in imminent danger of death or serious physical harm to person and that the only means to escape from the imminent danger is to use deadly force or other force that likely will cause physical harm or serious physical harm to the person of the trespasser, even if the owner, lessee, renter, or family member is mistaken as to the existence or imminence of the danger of death or serious physical harm to person.

State law sometimes covers marital status, but federal law does not.However, you might get sued for religious discrimination if you refuse to rent to couples "living in sin".

But, now you've clarified that you're just asserting "politically charged" and partisan beliefs.