Don't argue that three beer cans is a negligible wrongdoing.

An additional $100 per month is not negligible.

Unfortunately, this in turn can also have other adverse ramifications that may end up affecting the pocketbook of the landlord due to the tenant's ignorance and negligence or seemingly lackadaisical attitude in maintaining the property according to the terms of the lease.Case in PointTo prove a point, my company recently provided inspection services for a couple of commercial properties owned by a real estate investor who presently leases each property to a different franchise business, one of which represents a chain of successful retail store outlets (that doesn't need to advertise) and another that represents a successful 24/7 physical fitness exercise facility that often advertises on television during normal viewing hours.

My research and personal experience concludes that the holding company owns all the assets and the operating company rents or leases them from such and the holding company can’t be held liable for the operating company’s negligence, but that’s not true as in the case “ garden city co v burden”.

gives the buyer recourse from insurance.now of course you mess up and insurance is going to then subrigate and come after us if its gross negligence but if the ground shifts or siding is defective windows stuff like that 2  10 comes into play.

When you take over the management of a property, is the property management liable for any negligence or accident that happens to the tenant?

If so, if the difference negligible in light of have to wait another year to get into the market?

I often wonder if LLC separation is a little over sold, it is a down line defense. meaning, first line should be best practices and maintaining your property in good safe working order, second should be insurance, 3 could be a Mortgage, and 4th a legal entity, and in reality unless there was gross negligence its doubtful a suit ever goes beyond insurance. sometimes i think people over complicate things for very little. just my 2 cents 

Insurance is great, and I strongly say get it and as much coverage as you can get, but if a large claim does come due to negligence etc, You will most likely be suing your insurance provider while being sued yourself.

I think you’ll find that the impact to your costs of having an agent on your side, looking for deals that you aren’t privy to, especially when getting started, is negligible versus not having agent.