I am more numerical person as i am an engineer as you can tell.

Person A has much more expertise in regards to renovation, buying property, filling with tenants, property management, etc.  

We gave each person a vote weighted on his/her equity position.

I told them if either one did not pay they will have to make good for the other person as they are a team, 1 check for the total rent amount.

I wasn't feeling my superhero persona yesterday, but maybe I'll step it up!

I met Chris for the first time in person a few weeks ago and chat with him often on BP. 

Check this little creative method out: let's say person A and person B approach your rehab/construction business needing rehab.

I just found it odd that a persona as successful as they are, would be spreading in accurate knowledge.

Many times its difficult to find the property address or in some cases serve people in person as required by state law.

Person A Makes 150,000 a year pays 28% income tax Person B and C make 30,000 a year pays 15% income taxOkay so what im trying to get at is could you make the argument that it is unfair for Person B and C because they could be taxed at a lower rate personally instead of having the whole trust taxed at the high 39.6 rate (note Person A, Person B, And Person C all have 33 percent shareholding and the get the same dividends)It just seems like the savings within the S CORP work out good for Person a since his income tax is already high and the s corp saves within itself.Is this all sound?