
23 May 2018 | 4 replies
We love the historical looking houses, so not beachfront or anything.

23 May 2018 | 4 replies
Wrong location- many states are close to historical high values.

23 April 2008 | 2 replies
With historically high rates of default on home mortgages lenders are facing many more foreclosures than they have in the past.

27 April 2008 | 23 replies
If you do a little googling, you can find charts of historical housing prices.

30 April 2008 | 8 replies
I think blood is running in the streets homes for prospective buyers are selling for historically low prices.So, I have two questions for you:1.Will you preserve your principal (the money that you’re putting in?)

9 May 2008 | 4 replies
There are some decent places in these areas for reasonable prices, however many of them require serious rehabbing, and the problem you run into there is historical requirements.

8 May 2008 | 0 replies
Does some entity keep track of the historical adjustments of different institutions and their products?

17 June 2008 | 23 replies
Appreciation - I consider this icing on the cake, but property does historically appreciate over time.5.

2 July 2008 | 43 replies
:D Here in Australia, it's true that it's been historically difficult to get realtors to present an owner-financed deal to the vendors in such a way that it's likely to be accepted.

9 July 2008 | 163 replies
But I also refine my model every time I get new data, and one day I'll find that the 50% rule is actually the 48% rule (or the 45% rule, or whatever) for me, based on my economies of scale, my location, my costs, my network of professionals, etc.My only point is that experienced investors should trust *their own* numbers (including experience and historical data) more than the seller's, the realtor's, or even the 50% rule.I think where we are disagreeing is, if an investor were to come on this board and said, "I have 100 properties with average OE of 44%, and I'm looking for another 100 properties...what OE should I use for my future analysis?"