I'm still in the process of finding an alternative solution but I thought I'd leave this here as a warning for others looking to make a decision.For reference, I'll just post their email response to me here:As we review your inquiry, we would like to remind you of the following key points from our Terms of Use:In no instance shall ShinePay be liable for any of the following:"Lost revenue from service interruptions.Lost revenue stemming from delays, malfunctions of any product.unauthorized gains access to your account or due to shared passwords or if your password is hacked.Destruction to properly, places, or personal injury resulting from the installation, misinstalling, or misuse of any product.Lost revenue from entering the wrong account number for ACH or other bank transfer or money transfers or due to any delay in receiving funds.Damage to your structure, machines or car resulting from use or installation of our products.Any funds collected that are paid to a person that does not own the property.Any harm from defeating the lock and technology that controls the lock to a device.Failure to properly service any product or machine."

I would never own rental properties in my personal name.

She is not in a position to lend a personal loan to me. 

Remember, for any claim, if you can just find one case where that proposed claim does not work it is enough to prove that claim is false.So consider this.They it was told toy uo by others is inherently flawed simply by this fact:If I give you a list of 18 year old people that don't own a house... and that list is 2000 contacts large, how many deals are you going to make?

Byrna    it has an effective range of 60'  Have any experience with one of these?

If you have, you have put yourself at great personal risk.Again, I recommend you get a lawyer as soon as possible.

What RichDad does not tell you is that it takes a driven personality to build a portfolio and if you have that type of personality you will not enjoy a retired state.

@Erica King Sounds like this is more of a personal budgeting concern rather than a real estate one.

If I understand correctly; the seller would receive 80% ($40,000) directly from the mortgagee at closing and would enter into a personal agreement with me for the 20% down payment ($10,000) in which he would be reimbursed separately from my mortgage payments at a separately agreed upon rate and term?

Do you think they're worth the investment, or do most buyers still prefer in-person showings?