They wont.Primary residence holders can live in and enjoy the use of unpermitted work, self accepting known risks associated with it.  

It sounds like you might not qualify for a 121 exclusion, where you would have needed to live in the property for two out of the five years of owning it. 

For whatever reason, they accepted my first low offer to scoop them all up.

I added an amendment to the current lease and I increased the security deposit and rent (not by much though) and told the tenants that I will not be accepting the wife and child when they move here in 4-6 months.

In regards to the sale of their homes, it depends on who owns the homes, how many years it has been their primary residence etc. as it may be eligible for exclusion from capital gains.You also have to take into consideration for yourself, depreciation recapture as well as potential capital gains on your rental property.

Some things to be mindful of are the added costs of having to facilitate delivery and acceptance of the windows if you are purchasing them yourself rather than go through a contractor who both supplies and installs the windows.

Not to mention, they are not legally able to perform any of the duties or services they accept payments for.

Did you get an accepted bid?

Hi Miguelli,If you’re not depending on rental income for immediate needs and are focused on long-term growth, prioritizing appreciation and accepting some short-term cash flow challenges could be a smart strategy.

Generally, your home sale qualifies for the maximum exclusion, if all of the following conditions are true.....