Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 6 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

56
Posts
20
Votes
Jason V.
  • Mississippi
20
Votes |
56
Posts

Section 121 gains exclusion reported on what IRS forms if home was rental for 2 yrs??

Jason V.
  • Mississippi
Posted

It's my understanding that if there's a "partial exclusion", I'd use a Form 8949 with Code H...

And if it's "fully excluded" and there's no 1099-S issued (which I indeed received no 1099-S), then I'd simply not mention it at all.

But my biggest question is.... How do I determine if my being used as a rental for 2 out of past 5 years makes it fully or partially excluded?!?

Much thanks appreciated!!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

389
Posts
573
Votes
Jeff Nash
Pro Member
  • Accountant
  • McKinney, TX
573
Votes |
389
Posts
Jeff Nash
Pro Member
  • Accountant
  • McKinney, TX
Replied

Based on your fact pattern (was a personal residence first and then a rental, not vice versa) I think you might be looking better. That non-qualified use provision was written so that taxpayers couldn't convert highly appreciated rentals to personal residences, live in it for 2 years, and avoid paying any capital gains. So I think you might have misinterpreted what it was saying and it  might make sense if you read the worksheets carefully - you do not include any period of non-qualified use that occurred after the last day that the taxpayer or spouse used the property as the principal residence during the 5-year period prior to the date of sale. You count the days backward from the time of sale to address your last point. Hopefully you will be pleasantly surprised with the outcome.

  • Jeff Nash
  • [email protected]
  • 844-627-4829
  • Loading replies...