data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ed1a/4ed1ab1ddba0ce0bf6e20a978be7a1b1a5dde8d2" alt=""
8 October 2017 | 6 replies
Sorta as @Patrick M. said, it only excludes owner occupied under 4U.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/034a8/034a8a90cbd074690f05e587fba290e69e3dacbb" alt=""
5 February 2018 | 7 replies
If not, you can exclude a gain only on the 1/4 of the gain(assuming each unit is same).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46eec/46eeca71e3cd0270a328f3585f57914d9d30081f" alt=""
2 June 2018 | 112 replies
@Harry Williams One thing to keep in mind... when you pull your DOM, are you excluding dated properties and non-rehabbed homes?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6364f/6364fc91a606e04677c096dbc25362bfdd0005aa" alt=""
10 January 2023 | 4 replies
Gain is Sales price less selling expenses less adjusted basis.Talk to a CPA to confirm your gain and to see if there is anyway to defer or exclude the gain from your tax return.Best of luck
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff68b/ff68ba29feb2a477835231cda473111c7a4dad52" alt=""
20 July 2011 | 49 replies
., that you are aware of delineate "activities" included/excluded?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd6dc/dd6dc61bcc9e9d86d9d2227a01a29d3758de9e89" alt=""
25 November 2022 | 7 replies
or 80 (my rents minus operating expenses, but excluding principal payments)?.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2cda/b2cdae599bf5c1b1846a96bb9eb9164edd91504e" alt=""
17 August 2016 | 5 replies
Doing so will exclude lost rent in case of a loss.Any input to what others do for their rentals is appreciated.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3d10/e3d1008617ceb2bd54f2afdd909515cc60a0c9e3" alt=""
8 October 2020 | 12 replies
Your theory that higher income will self-exclude more marginal applicants is correct.Personally, I don't want "frugal but good" tenants.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4661/d4661cb1da301dd10b92452984c04246911fc39f" alt=""
5 August 2019 | 17 replies
Hi @Danielle Wolter -I see this same situation in the SF Bay Area all the time ... here's the process that I would use to help think through this:Since I don't know your exact situation, I'll make up some numbers that may or may not be close to what you're dealing with ... my guess, though, is that they'll be in the ballpark:- let's say you bought for $500k ... the PI on your loan might be around $2100/mo- condo in downtown SD ... you might have a $450/mo HOA fee- prop tax ... in the range of $525/mo- insurance ... maybe another $75/mo- sub total: $3150/mo (and I'm excluding repairs, prop mgmt, etc)- potential rent: $2400/mo- cash flow: -$750/mo ... -$9k/yrYou're looking for appreciation, so let's say you hold the property for the next 10 years ... you could be $90k in the hole from negative cash flow at that point (I know that's unrealistic, but this is just an example :).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/693c4/693c4aa916497a912b019265a1c8951dc8e53e11" alt=""
20 December 2022 | 1 reply
If you experienced appreciation while it was your primary residence, be sure to consider the loss of the section 121 gain exclusion on the sale of a primary residence...250k/500k gains excluded from tax for single/married on the sale of a primary residence...goes away if you hold as a rental longer than three years.