
25 April 2008 | 2 replies
In three years you will have payed only a few thousand against the principle of your note.

27 April 2008 | 23 replies
That "me" principle all over again which they pass on to their kids.
10 August 2008 | 2 replies
I finally paid it off because the principle reduction was so small after 6 years it didn't seem viable.

29 April 2008 | 8 replies
Every discussion I've seen about bird dogging has the bird dog NOT being a principle.

27 January 2009 | 11 replies
The monthly payments are comprised of principle ("some" of which is a return OF what you've got in the place) some of it's income in the year received.Congratulationsall cash

30 April 2008 | 8 replies
Or rent it out and hope to gain equity over time via the principle payments and hopefully appreciation.Please continue to let me know your thoughts!

21 May 2008 | 7 replies
Does it sound ethical to you?

21 February 2019 | 16 replies
If the bank won't allow "and/or assigns" you can put it somewhere else in the verbiage of the contract and see if it gets thru...or, you can simply make up a fee agreement with the other parties involved outside of the two principle parties (buyer and seller)...most important - get it in writing!

8 May 2008 | 7 replies
Sometimes having one is a disadvantage as you are subject to a higher code of ethics being a licensee.

16 May 2008 | 10 replies
The practice has infuriated me for as long as I can remember—mostly because: 1) I am not one of those children or grandchildren, 2) The wacked-out principles behind such gifts, and 3) What often happens to the money and the recipients.