Mass doesn't have licensing requirements for PM's so there are some fools out there.

It’s a tactic that can work, especially when both parties understand and agree on the process. the issue is with this sub to  soup de jour your going to get all sorts of fraudsters coming to play and that is just a fact.. once they figure out the angles..

Subject-To is an extremely high-risk play for anyone not capable and/or comfortable with selling, refinancing, or repaying 100% of all Subject-To debt balances, all at once (if they have multiple). 

Add Colorado to the list of states that insurers are fleeing, along with California and Florida.All the states that are prone to natural disasters, insurance costs are exploding as the insurers pull out of those states en mass.

Like @JD Martin mentions, it could be any number of small things like a faucet turned to open.The good news is, they don't know what's wrong either so play it like it's $5k. 

Purchase price: $55,000 Cash invested: $85,000 Sale price: $280,000 I feel like luck and timing played a roll in scooping up this Garfield Park home.

Without some on the ground knowledge those really low prices in some of the neighborhoods can really play some tricks on those "out of state eyes."

I am also a believer in not buying a property without any value add play. 

It’s still up-and-coming, so there are some rough spots, but it could be a solid long-term play.

In my experience the basics for a functional RE based CRM are:Custom Fields for Data Objects (Leads, Prospects, Applications, Buildings, Units, etc...)A Screening Engine (background/credit checks, employment verification, etc)Online Rental Application (this should automatically run the application through screening)Ability to mass email/sms leads and tenants to provide informationSurveys/Inspection formsI've been building real estate CRM tools for years.