City planners advocate for this sort of treatment to preserve the ratio of homeowner to renters, or planners are attempting to change the direction of investment in their city altogether.  

With a fund some can offer tax preferred treatment such as dividend vs ordinary income so it’s something to review not just gross but net returnsThere is no right or wrong answer to this, it’s truly a preference and how comfortable you are with each type of investment

This class-A medical office and treatment space is slated to bring 1,200 new high-paying jobs to the district.

We experienced low energy, brain fog, sore throats, headaches, unexplained cough, and more every day for the year we lived there.

For example, Drive Planning and Burkhalter spent $319,628 on clothing, jewelry, and beauty treatments.

I would say accountants have to gain here as well, I would add the entity doesn't result in better tax treatment, ideally, it is not done (in general).

The question becomes, is there any way to legally repatriate the income as 'active' income to maintain the favourable tax treatment in the US all the way into Canada.Still researching...

So In SIMPLE terms; you are stating that REGARDLESS of whether the FULL $60K in funds paid to the Seller for the OPTION to buy the home at $300K is APPLIED towards that $300K "Strike Price" reducing the remaining amount due to them to $240K OR if only $30K of the $60K in funds paid to the Seller is APPLIED reducing the the remaining amount due to them to $270K - the Tax Treatment for THEM (the seller) is the SAME on the $60K paid for the OPTION ?

I have heard that heat treatment can damage silicone seals in plumbing.

So unless you add additional collateral from their SoRE, then don't do it.