That definitely is entering the danger zone.  

It could be a number of problems like major foundation damage,difficult tenants and neighbors,dangerous neighborhood,etc.Just have to get in there and see for yourself.

its a classic sub too rip the rents scenario.. and why I personally think Sub too is extremely dangerous for the average seller.. there are NO assumptions any more.. banks dont' do that.your person who is on the loan has now got her credit trashed because of this.. they don't own the home its a nightmare situation.. of the first order.you would have to find the sleaze ball who bought the deal and get them to deed it to you..

Screening needs to be more targeted, and be capable of showing an actual connection between the type and age of conviction and the harm to be avoided by the landlord, such as credit risk, damage to property, or danger to other tenants.  

They are all experts on the dangers of real estate and they feel it is their job to warn you.

For information on how that applies to your case, seek out an attorney, but the beneficiary designations are related to this distinction. 

LOL, you'll find a lot of free advice on BP, it can be a dangerous place.    

It was very dangerous and difficult to remove from the foundation of the house.

I cannot speak for Canada, but the crap you posted is dangerous in the United States in general, and even more dangerous in some states.

Danger, Will Robinson!