From the other stuff I know about that looks like it could stand alone, as best I can tell the list includes government funded abortions, healthcare for illegal immigrants and taxpayer subsidization of union healthcare plans.

Currently, it's doctors (60% of the costs are uncompensated) and the taxpayers (40% of the total compensation comes from the VA, Federal and Local government sources).

If they even touch this, inefficiencies will abound and grow, prices will go up even higher, and the taxpayers who, in a better system, could have paid much less for their own damn isurance, will be forced, whether they can afford it or not, to pay for everyone else's.

For married taxpayers, the law tests the homeownership history of both the home buyer and his/her spouse.For example, if you have not owned a home in the past three years but your spouse has owned a principal residence, neither you nor your spouse qualifies for the first-time home buyer tax credit.

She also took in rescue horses occassionally.So she was spending $600-$900 a month on pet horses while the taxpayers paid 100% of her $600 rent.

The County treasurer is about 4 weeks behind with accepting transfer tax payments.

So anything else, like insurance, tax payments if they come due, overages, extra holding time, etc. will come out of your pocket.

In other words, I'm trying to lower my taxable income in the C-corp while injecting the LLC with cash for improvement projects.Let me be clear on something though- I pay taxes, but I am always trying to legally lower my tax payments.

Since many of these banks are TARP funded and hence tax payer supported, I fear this task force will be taking on several of the FBI’s list in their activities.Nothing to do but stay informed, be transparent, and talk to your trusted legal advisors IN YOUR STATE!

But had the deal gone through, the new owner would have paid more than an informed buyer probably would have, Freddie Mac would have been denied a legitimate recovery, and the real estate agent would have fraudulently netted a $65,000 profit at the taxpayers’ expense.”Hmmmm....