data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca850/ca850ac3c9d93cbfa061cd2b13839b322839e52e" alt=""
7 August 2010 | 7 replies
Either way I knew a secret that no one in the room knew, this cash cow (his description) was two years behind in the tax payments, in our area the city is totally inept and allows folks to get 10-15 years behind.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17910/17910c7b5a54cabc0851ec04e04e2375a3790aba" alt=""
22 June 2010 | 7 replies
The greedy banks took the money from the government (taxpayer's pockets) and then did not use it for the use it was intended for.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d5a/71d5ae9613141d5eddc405bef66d22d46449d593" alt=""
11 July 2010 | 8 replies
But with the financial services industry, this is not allowed to happen and instead taxpayers foot the bill when there is a bust.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c319/7c319e49e2d1d493355b294798e67fd2323c435b" alt=""
10 August 2010 | 25 replies
It is exactly the same mentality of someone who refuses to get a job because they can live off entitlements, live off the tax payer, well the failure to serve in some capacity is the same thing as living off the blood of others who ensure our freedoms while the moochers refuse to participate in the cost of any such benefits.I doubt anyone on this site can tell me about forced service in the miliatry.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e683/1e6835510ff59f0cd54101fca795082d1dff3f17" alt=""
29 September 2010 | 38 replies
Our "poor" people sit in their Section 8 rental watching Judge Judy reruns on their big screen tv while eating potato chips purchased with their SNAP card (food stamps) and occassionally chatting on their taxpayer-paid cellphone!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68450/68450a1c6cba6c5d74fdd774b665a0d89d5c19b9" alt=""
19 September 2010 | 12 replies
Taxpayer cost per job: $1.5 million.The Los Angeles Department of Transportation created even fewer jobs per dollar, spending $40 million but netting just 9 jobs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49621/49621a7a79668a871223ac2813363f9513cd5f35" alt=""
11 March 2012 | 15 replies
It is really a Medicare surcharge on investment income (which also includes dividends, interest, and royalties) levied on high income tax payers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99625/99625401464e6932a07ea325a057d02d1488a69c" alt=""
18 March 2011 | 4 replies
It is not clear to me that this system is "better" for taxpayers or not.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2177d/2177dfae20b16e1544e90970fb99efda85063772" alt=""
21 August 2009 | 22 replies
We're apparently wasting tax payer money and getting few benefits out of it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b0c5/0b0c534051326a6c4c5feb23a6237a3b54988621" alt=""
28 August 2009 | 5 replies
Big business does these types of cuts all the time.If Congresspersons were required to serve 20, 25 or 30 years (like everyone else) in order to collect retirement benefits, tax payers could save a bundle.