Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,234
Posts
1,197
Votes
Mike McKinzie
  • Investor
  • Westminster, CO
1,197
Votes |
1,234
Posts

Stimulus

Mike McKinzie
  • Investor
  • Westminster, CO
Posted

L.A.: $111M in Stimulus Saved Just 55 Jobs

More than a year after Congress approved $800 billion in stimulus funds, the Los Angeles City Controller has released a 40-page report on how the city spent its share, and the results are not living up to expectations.

"I'm disappointed that we've only created or retained 55 jobs after receiving $111 million," said Wendy Greuel, the city's controller. "With our local unemployment rate over 12% we need to do a better job cutting red tape and putting Angelenos back to work."

According to the audit, the Los Angeles Department of Public Works spent $70 million in stimulus funds and created 7 private sector jobs and saved 7 workers from layoffs. Taxpayer cost per job: $1.5 million.

The Los Angeles Department of Transportation created even fewer jobs per dollar, spending $40 million but netting just 9 jobs. Taxpayer cost per job: $4.4 million.

Greuel blamed the dismal numbers on several factors:

*******************************************************************

So my question to the BP members: How many jobs could you create with $111,000,000.00?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

825
Posts
486
Votes
Kevin Yeats
  • Lender
  • Fort Pierce, FL
486
Votes |
825
Posts
Kevin Yeats
  • Lender
  • Fort Pierce, FL
Replied

One major, troublesome aspect with government work is measuring it *output*.

As Rich above stated, we could pay 2,200 people $50K each to pick up trash but are cleaner parks and streets *worth* $50K per year ... assuming one trash collector per community. Could we hire 4,400 people at $25,000 per year and generate twice as many jobs?

How about hiring them to dig holes on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays and filling the holes on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays? By the bean counters, these are jobs created but what did they produce? On net NOTHING!

It is interesting to look at the funds this Administration doled out to "create or save teacher's job." The cost for saving each job is somewhere around or over $100,000 per job. Now explain to an hourly worker how his/her taxes have to go up so that this teacher earns that kind of money.

I suggest that if Federal dollars are used to pay for state, county and municipal jobs that those workers have to go on Federal pay scales.

Taxpayers have to sacrifice so they can have a job, government workers should also bear part of the pain.

Loading replies...