If I move (which wouldn't be more than 4 hours by car away) my girlfriend can live there or I can simply rent it out and have a management company deal with it.3) I want some equity in something as opposed to renting for another 8-12 months.

I am not opposed to HML, if the terms are right.Any thoughts are appreciated.Thanks all.

I generally charge less than a good GC would charge, so it's a lot cheaper for the investor I'm working with to just pay me a flat fee, as opposed to an equity split or percentage.

My vote would be to do a complete tear off and if you have to skimp to make your numbers work skimp on something that you are doing for your "ego" as opposed to making money on the deal.

Here is just a quick example of why you should never do this:"Those considering obtaining attributes because investments will appreciate that roughly 42% of Memphis neighborhood occupants hire as opposed to personal their own homes and additionally it really is an region where investors currently have little trouble keeping their qualities rented.

Typically you see more of these secured by commercial property as opposed to residential.

I tend to take someone more serious if they have an actual picture of themselves as opposed to some random thing.

I've been told that once an MLS short sale has been approved, you can make an offer slightly lower (maybe a few thousand) than the approved price and it will still go through relatively quickly (as opposed to an unapproved SS).Has anyone on here actually done this?

It is more of a cosmetic thing and a make you feel good sort of idea opposed to something that has real legal merit.

Trying to answer your question on why smaller companies can do this as opposed to larger companies, my only theory would be that smaller companies can sell their property cheaper then larger companies so the smaller companies returns look better.