
18 March 2009 | 30 replies
When you go there with questions you will get answers that are not necessarily based upon the laws of that state but based upon how the laws should be interpreted for the benefit of their members.They are a powerful lobbing group that attempts to get laws passed that requires you to use their services.

14 April 2009 | 3 replies
That's way to long to tie up money in my opinion.at PP of $900k, the cap rate is 6.67%, not 10%, and that's not something open to interpretation.

21 April 2009 | 3 replies
I would interpretate that to mean you could not use a new appraisal in youru case, either, unless you made substantial improvements to your property.

8 June 2009 | 33 replies
All forms of media are open to interpretation.

11 June 2009 | 9 replies
I would interpret that to mean any written offer even if electronically transmitted to be required to be submitted to the seller.

8 July 2009 | 8 replies
Because you're calling as a principal in the transaction, my interpretation (and others in REI that I've discussed this with) is that you're not 'soliciting' anything.

20 July 2009 | 177 replies
Meaning it is subject to interpretation, otherwise there was no need for the supreme court.

7 September 2010 | 13 replies
If I could teach a generation of kids how to analyse and critically interpret data that would be a legacy to be proud of

12 September 2010 | 8 replies
Laws are open to interpretation and this hasn't been tested.

15 September 2010 | 19 replies
Will, I am sure each of us has a different way of interpreting what is written.