I agree with your definition of hazards, but the HUD wording I posted earlier does not limit this to just hazards; read that as you see fit if you don't agree with how I have interpreted that wording.As to those who believe that Rob started this with a specific agenda in mind - well, maybe that is true.

So I wouldn't even attempt trying to get the seller $$ as it could be interpreted as fraud.

Maybe I am interpreting what you wrote incorrectly though...

As to whether Aaron Norris said that his group provides funding for the end buyer, I mistakenly interpreted his comment about using auctions as meaning that, as part of the auction process, his group also provides funding without seasoning at hard money prices.

My interpretation of all of this is that yes, a land contract is considered a sale in the year that the land contract is signed (would be 09 for my case), and the buyer can apply for the tax credit by filing an amended 08 return.

So many loopholes and so many ways to interpret.

The first amendment only prohibits the Congress from "censoring" your speech although the Supreme Court has interpreted it as also applying to the Executive and Judicial branches.Even though the first amendent gives you the right to free speech, there are laws which limit how you exercise your right.

IE corrupts a LOT of sites and is very buggy.That said, this problem we're discussing is a bug in the browser interpreting what part of the page is text and what isnt.

When someone has a 0% interest payment they can afford more house, that was thier thinking anyway.Appraisers interpret the market they do not set the market.

Mark - Can you see how some might interpret your recommendations as being hard to follow because by promoting this course you're also profiting from it?