I’ve got several FB friends posting about how Keller Williams is about to disrupt the industry.

We have advertised and explained that we need a completed application before we show it, to reduce disruption to the tenant. 

But he doesn’t not want to disrupt his kids schooling.

Is it illegal to discriminate against loud/disruptive people regardless of age?

Do you have the ability to renovate moderately right now without tapping into reserves or disrupting cash flow?

And if the Squatter has a child, the judge will let them continue living in the house through June, so as not to disrupt the childs' education.

So why disrupt a tenant when odds are good the person is just a looker?

Tiny markets, even fast-growing ones, are just more volatile and subject to disruption from unexpected changes.

Maybe Treasury will decide that banks are NOT too big to fail, maybe China defaults on their own debts, maybe Brexit causes more to follow and causes EU to crumble, maybe China unloads all the US debt that they have at discount prices, who knows.What I do know is that about every 10 years or so stuff happens in big amounts and causes disruptions.

They're issuing the order to vacate.I wonder how I would have done if I was just trying to evict him for being a disruptive tenant?