Like aircraft checklists and vehicle operators manuals (the -10s), one can benefit from extensive research, trial and error, and deliberate improvement principles gained by the many that have gone the path before. 

I don't know that there is a much bigger vetting process other than if they can pay for leads, but correct me if I am wrong.I have been on here for ten years and sourced hundreds of leads without ever asking for a single thing because all I do is show up and answer questions and add value.

Road access, road view, VPD, Path:1.  

Being able to parallel path different leads seems valuable; somebody does my calls while I'm connecting with wholesalers / other agents, etc.

It might help to give context to their complaints so we could decide if they should have known that.Most MTR guests won't have many complaints if the place is set up correctly and cleaned, so I always expect to handle anything they want, within reason and even a little beyond.

I am currently moving through my first assignment of RPA escrow period and all of the seasoned people who shared their "assignment of agreement addendum" experiences and insight has given me the confidence to know I am moving in the right direction and taking the correct steps in order to close this transaction correctly. 

Your definition is correct for "legal non-conforming".The "legal" part of "non-conforming" is dropped when it doesn't apply so most commonly people call these units "non-conforming", "finished", "in-law suite/unit", or "bonus unit".Non-conforming: Any property that doesn't meet current zoning requirements.Legal non-conforming: A non-conforming property that was lawfully established under previous zoning regulations and is allowed to continue its use.Based on his posts @Mario Morales is referring to a non-conforming unit.

@Richard PastorI would urge you to get a commitment from a lender on a heloc BEFORE going down this path.

One thought if Scottsdale still owned the notes was, see if we can buy them at a discount and make a spread on re-selling them, but having seen that interview, you're probably correct that they had already sold them on anyways, keeping that spread themselves (which never got back to investors!

Yes, that's correct.