The plain reality is they are doing their job and like it or not, they are tasked with bringing the house into code for the protection of their resident or future resident.

My thought is to Open the LLC in a different state with lower costs and fewer regulations and relying on the insurance for protection (for any case, even if eventually ill decide to bring tenants into the property).I’d love to hear your thoughts on this.Thanks!

Even though WE are NOT originating a loan here; it would be the EX-Husband who would be "originating" the Loan (by taking back the Deed of Trust and Note) in order to SELL his 50% interest in the house, the TIE IN is with our BUYING or INVESTING in the purchase of the DOT and Note to generate CASH to him, and CASH OUT to Her is wherethis becomes a "Gray Area" of whether it violates any of the CFPB Consumer Financial Protection Bureaus requirements and could be re-characterized as a high cost LOAN IN DISGUISE ALTERNATIVE THINKING We are thinking a better way to go here IF the EX-Wife agrees; it to SELL the house NOW, pay off the EX- Husband and enter into a 3 year LEASEBACK with the buyer of the home. 

There s no longer any Federal protection for "tenants in foreclosure", it expired......state regs rule.

We cover everything from wholesaling to asset protection strategies.  

LLCs are over-rated for liability protection and/or tax benefits.

We want to have legal protection WHEN its applicable.

This can allow a person to get much better diversification protection across geographies, asset types, strategies, investment subclasses etc.

There is no need to double nest with Wyoming LLCs; same-state LLCs sometimes offer more protections.

That's gotta be some sort of protection.