Housing does NOT use this distinction. 

For you, there is no distinction between one dollar and another, stick to your conventional disclosures but you can omit those specific to the retention of loans from a wholesaler (% sold) and provide your own (I'd say something like 95%, that gets deeper, but you can sell, assign or retain your loan).

The only way to rid the home of the scent of urine is to rip up the flooring and, if soaked into concrete, treat or replace the concrete area.  

Its not without hassle though, that's an important distinction, tuckpointing, brick sealing, and potential wall separation/collapse are always considerations. 

I think you need to make that distinction that your dealing with TX.. the laws in OR WA and CA are very strict when it comes to foreclosure rescue no matter how you do it.. thats why I do not do it anymore. 

There is a distinct difference between development and construction.

I think the value given to landlord- or tenant-friendly as a distinction is often confused, misunderstood, and errant.

There is a distinct advantage of having local management, though with technology it's possible to manage from a distance yourself.

What I remember so distinctly about acquiring the first rental is how there were a lot of documents and signatures, but no actual money at the closing.

Ok thank you I understand the distinction now.