That was actually my concern, getting the type of tenant that don't destroy the property.

I wonder how many people’s financial futures have been destroyed by “experts” predicting a housing crash.

They feel jealous, angry and motivated to destroy wholesaler, so (as they think) all the assigning fee can sink in their pockets.

I did have over 200 section 8 houses as I drank the cool aid way back when .. but geesh now we just stick to A class and live with the 4 to 6% returns and no drama and no destroyed houses.. its more than just the tenants its also the neighborhoods were crime is real etc..

Due to a reduction in supply (properties destroyed or rendered unlivable) and an increase in demand (from those displaced by having their properties destroyed or rendered unlivable), home prices and especially rents actually tend to go up immediately after natural disasters.

Tenants destroying a property is going to cost you FAR more than any missed rents.  

One of my clients almost lost his chance at a claim because his originals were destroyed in the storm, but luckily, he had everything backed up.Hang in there, Joe!

While no properties actually flooded, the entire area was a disaster - roads destroyed, rescues, loss of power, and loss of safe drinking water than lasted for two weeks.  

If you don't have "flood" or "wind" coverage within your policy (or under a separate policy), then you very likely won't have loss of rents/income protection when your building is destroyed by the perils of flood or wind. 

But Cleveland had all their data destroyed in a cyber attack.