From all the BP podcasts I have listened to, I know they are Brandon's bread and butter :)

My family's bread and butter has been industrial warehousing and real estate (my husband has a commercial firm that specializes in those properties) and the flow of international trade and related industry has not slowed.

That's my bread-and-butter too. 

I have also been looking for investment property in Amherst and was just advised to stay away since I was reminded that many of the properties there are in jeopardy of having major foundation issues due to the "peanut butter" texture of the clay soil of Lake Tonawanda that the houses were built on....I've done a bit of research on the issue as I'm looking for my first and not wanting to get in too deep. 

Of course we wised up and adopted the market we did business policy had to be bread and butter, or better and our world changed.Of course I'm still serious about suggesting a well thought out suggestion on a small amendment to current statute being presented to your district rep.

Truly the bread and butter of travelling nurses in Knoxville this summer seems to be the unused extra 1-bedrooms in a family home that people are renting $800-1000/month all in. 

That's his bread and butter, where as I will not lend on mobile homes at all. 

Single family has been my bread and butter, why change a variable.I've met a lot of people who retired with a handful of paid off or leveraged properties here in their mid thirties.

As a Realtor and real estate investor, I couldn't help but think how this extra $1,000/mo might affect the housing market.INCREASED HOUSING AFFORDABILITYThe first implication of this extra $1,000/mo is that it would make housing much more affordable in most markets, potentially reducing the monthly costs by 33% or greater for most bread and butter housing markets.A $250k home with only 5% down and a 4.5% interest rate has a PITI of roughly $1,700/mo.

(Reference Kenoe on Land Trusts 1989) just so you know this ruling stops the partitioning of beneficial interest in a LT so a creditor could not pierce the trust with a charging order since other beneficiaries would be negatively impacted.The worse case scenario would be the creditor can take that say 10% beneficial interest in the trust and they would not get paid until the property sold to cash out but the trust itself it NOT pierced and nothing is ironclad.The LLC protect the LLC members form liability and the LT protect the "corpus" or real property.Depending on your exit strategy determines the trust you should use and how it would be setup.I use LT in my investing and honestly like the way they work when done right so just wish to chime in.LT also work very well in multiple investor scenarios on property.LLC and Land Trusts are like bread and butter they work very well together that is basically my point.Mitch as to grant claim deed my understanding is you show proven reliable chain of title and that you have documentation you have the right of ownership.