This is fine but they do tend to be more stressed because they take small issues and blow them out of proportion because they don't have the experience. 

* Another, perhaps far-out option, & borrowing from the “Using a 1031 exchange to fund a buyout” thread:Take title for RPL1 (potentially & RPL2…) possibly using a Land Trust along with non-prohibited entity and with proportional ownership, then acquire pro rata interest as RLNs liquidate.Thoughts?  

In my case they’ve always asked I pay the loan down proportionally to the value being released. 

@Matt R.Wrt the heating comments, this may be as simple as a compact single room ductless HRV unit.

I.e. we both profit in proportion to the percentage equity we put in.

One such theorist is the worlds most popular online naturopathic doctor Joseph Mercola talking about "The Great Reset" and "Build Back Better" as well as proof on many front from multiple sources that the virus was been blown WAY OUT OF PROPORTION to say the least. 

Yes, I DO have a background in contract law, and I have consulted in litigation for such including interstate compact litigation. 

I think it's very market-specific - there are cities / markets where large funds own a sizable proportion of the housing stock, and other cities / markets (even entire states) where they don't own a single property.  

Rents have not kept pace with the proportion of the increase in expenses and prices.

Not necessarily if those items are the norm in the area, but the purchase price should have been proportionally lower for the poor components.