
16 April 2010 | 23 replies
In my city there are quite a few historic neighborhoods, but they all border some really bad neighborhoods, so the resale is limited.
18 April 2010 | 26 replies
One other thing, "Is it within the borders of existing law (RESPA and such) to share your short sale profits with the realtor that turns over a short sale to you?"

25 November 2010 | 90 replies
He is well beyond the borders of rational, scientific discussion.

29 April 2010 | 13 replies
The community is right out of suburbia with neighbors only a legal setback away from your property's border.

24 May 2010 | 32 replies
That would be interesting, imospanish speaking- this will also change, especially if dems continue to have open border policy.

16 June 2009 | 27 replies
They are intended to provide a framework for defining what is and is not acceptable in society within particular borders (for example, the DC legislature creates laws that are applicable to DC).

28 June 2009 | 25 replies
Like North Korea not submitting to the U.N. about ceasing nuclear testing...thats right NUCLEAR testing WHILE stating that they will "wipe America of the map" How about a little preemptive war for that, theres no "possibility" of WMD's, they agree whole heartedly that they have them...Castro is still in power...the Mexican border is a massacre on a regular basis with drug lords shuttling drugs into America...yup that one directly effects us too...Again, I cant thank the military enough for being able to do what they do, my 21 year old brother is a Marine in the middle east,...but what is the government of 4236 families thanking them for?

21 June 2009 | 0 replies
If you're not sure where Joplin is, it's almost the most SW you can get, near the Arkansas, Oklahoma and Kansas border.
24 June 2009 | 0 replies
Barnes and Noble and Borders can be used as a Library full of useful information, buy a coffee, sit down with a stack of books and read until one stands out to you.

28 July 2009 | 86 replies
I know it is in the Bill of Rights and I know the interpretation is that it's an individual right and I know the Founding Father's intentions with it from reading the Federalist Papers....and I think it's states rights to regulate this within the property borders of the state.