That books explains how it works and gives you all the practical tools to get started.

Solid income, and pay increases, often offset "stupid mortgage rules," like the 75% thing that everyone knows is too conservative, or letting departing residence rental income offset that mortgage payment but only that mortgage payment (you can't "use" the "change" anywhere else).One practical problem that I've experienced in the last ten year  is that since it's househacking, some banks can accept multiple leases into one home, some can accept single home only, and some can't accept it all.

However, over the years there have been several favorable rullings with regard to other structures (especially types of trusts) that have most folks feeling comfortable with this practice.

Their marketing practices are very deceptive.

For buyers or their brokers with well capitalized investors, inquiring directly for verification of a property whether it has an assumable note is good practice while interest rates remain elevated. 

In the hot areas in my market where we are using escalation clauses...it is standard practice to show the first page with names blacked out to justify the escalation amount.

You aren’t a bad person for asking this question.The answer to your question is that there is no practical difference in how they will be as tenants.

I have access to others of like mind that can help me put syndicates together to purchase larger apartments.Outside of real estate, I'm busy as a CFO to a large dental practice that my husband owns that brings in capital for us to invest in RE... and I love taking care of my girls that are 16, 13, and 9 and teaching them all about passive income investing via RE.

I'm a newbie and still practicing doing the analysis and want to see if I'm on the right track.  

Short (practical) answer: No.Long answer: You could, but you will need some unusually great compensating factors.