Our goal is to me a more accessible luxury option for couples and families.  

Use them as a guide and let the conversation flow naturally and you stand a better chance of striking up a conversation that can at least lead to a more in-depth discussion. 

If you want a better output you can always add more details.Potential Improvements:You could specify the types of properties (residential, commercial, etc.) or the size and diversity of your portfolio to receive more tailored advice.You could provide information about your company's specific objectives or values for a more aligned recommendation.If you have preferences for how you'd like the scoring or rating system to be (numerical, grade-based, color-coded, etc.), that could be included.If you have had previous experiences with property managers that you found particularly beneficial or problematic, including those could provide context and help tailor the advice more specifically to your needs.If there are particular areas you are concerned about (legal issues, maintenance, tenant relations, etc.), emphasizing these could provide more detailed and relevant advice.

A more accurate description for yourself might be you are a landlord looking to buy your first property.

Given you rental properties cash flows positive after the cash our refinance, this sound like a more safer route.

One could see directly we were all drawing from our combined experience for a more measured approach to build to rent, which is on its own iterative journey to standardization.

With MWU's nursing & medical school, you may find some opportunities to rent to a more professional crowd.

I'm leaning towards Philadelphia because I personally find the area more interesting, and it seems like a more international city. 

I’m sure this number would be higher in a more urban setting.

So in your experience, it sounds like you’ve had more success investing in a more expensive market and building equity as opposed to cheaper, lower quality properties in places like the Midwest?