Investment Info: Multi-family residential buy & hold investment located a 20-mile drive or 25-minute ferry ride from downtown Boston in the beach town of Hull, Massachusetts, also known as Nantasket Beach.Purchase price: $550,000 in 2016Cash invested: $137,500 from 1031 exchange (75% mortgage)A 14-unit property on a corner lot, and it includes an adjacent lot as well (10,000 sq ft total lot size, double the town median lot size), giving an exceptionally large patio, yard, parking areas front and back, and a storage shed.

Thinking of just having my guys just down the hill help me out, it might be worth the drive to them to make a bit more per square foot then what I am being quoted by the locals in Truckee.

Hopefully, we can drive a significant amount of veterans to the industry.- Attend the three major parking industry conventions this year. 

The city has attracted substantial investments from companies like Intel, Google, Honda and more driving job growth, increasing housing demand and boosting property values.

Thanks for the reply - The limitation, for me, was the company is headquartered in Dubai, the properties in Africa and Middle East and the investors all over the place.I am deep within this rabbit hole.Syndication Pro was immediate to tell me, we won't work for youInvestNext says they have multi-currency support and should not pose any issues - I am going to test InvestNext, infact their Docs are in my email now to sign. 

Unfortunately, many regulations, such as design standards, go far beyond important safety concerns, and impose costly mandates on developers that drive housing costs higher.

You need to start thinking a little more thoroughly, and be able to articulate, and test, your assumptions.

For those who don't know the market its not a place you want to drive through at night. 

You need to pull out your property disclosure statement and see if a case passes the sniff test.

Did you know that Canadian investors who own U.S. property for over 183 days in a year may be considered a U.S. resident for tax purposes under the “Substantial Presence Test?”