I perceive that as ideal actually.

With your advice I am more likely to be perceived as defending against this practice, and I will avoid gaining a reputation as a "fish", to borrow from a poker analogy.Many thanks.

I.e people are willing to accept a negative real return in return for safety (or more correctly, perceived safety).

Say if you work 9-5 and go to bed at 11, you have 6 hours after work, maybe an hour before work as well.To summarize, in my view, the perceived laziness is a result of disenchantment of the compensation system of today.

Ping him with my name and I am sure he will give you a moment of his time to see if he can help, he is a VERY GOOD guy.PM me for his name and number, as I don't want to be perceived by the mods as advertising. . .Tevis

You get that in court saying I'll sell at some future price and give you the right to do so if you pay me some value today is totally illogical and that won't hold well.If you call a certain contract by a name there are expectations of that contract conforming to the requirements perceived and associated with it.You can have a future sale contract where you may agree to future prices, commit to sell, obtain consideration for holding the property off the market, but that certainly is not an option contract.All outhouse lawyers please report to the remedial RE class!

They are paying for a perceived value that sometimes others either don't see or they don't need so they put no value on it at all.

I can do nothing about how my offer is perceived, so it's a waste of time to take that into consideration.

Look into the velocity of money and GDP.You need to consider that some profit more from poor economic times and that there is clearly the effects of perceived market reactions of the economy crashing simply drags out any recovery and may sabotage relief.

Zero, but must have collateral to take if u mess up, and has to be a ridiculously low amount if perceived risk to who is lending he money to u