
6 January 2014 | 22 replies
And, I don't have a lot of deals under my belt, so maybe I just haven't yet been burned too badly.

5 January 2014 | 10 replies
I say former just because I burned myself out working a full-time job and trying to do RE full time and one paid more than the other at the time.So, now I'm looking into the future with investing.

15 January 2014 | 13 replies
I am not aware if they are ACTUALLY more dangerous or not, but haven't had any issues (for example, electric burners stay hotter longer, even though they don't look hot - easier to burn a kid accidentally?).

8 January 2014 | 5 replies
. , @Donald Stevens , @Eric Belgau and @Edward Burns .

15 January 2014 | 12 replies
Although it is grandfathered, the city will not allow for another duplex to be built here if it is burned down.

13 January 2014 | 5 replies
It's good to be driven, but make sure you don't stretch yourself too thin otherwise you'll get burned out!

3 February 2014 | 30 replies
I look at things this way, if a tenant has renters insurance and the owner has homeowners insurance in the event your home burns down the tenant isn't placing a claim on on the structure and getting a paid for it.

19 January 2014 | 37 replies
If you aren't going to make it a legal unit, don't bother.This.Safety.If the place actually burned down/flooded out/etc., I would think insurance might re-think they "oh, no worries" approach and try to find a loophole so they don't have to pay your claim.

11 December 2014 | 16 replies
But $500 is cheap, and you'll wish you had it when you're standing in front of an $80,000 burned out wreck.