When I was in the real estate valuation industry, one of folks' biggest let downs was the misunderstanding that upgrading a property in a bad neighborhood will give a return on value.

Would this be a reasonable way to negotiate (or am I completely misunderstanding the concept): Scenario 1: Seller decides not to budge on the 8% interest rate so I offer to keep the rate at 8% but to purchase the house at $125,000 in order for him to make his interest and keep my monthly payment low enough to have a high cash flow on the property.

Which Iv done plenty in this thread, either by misunderstand someones point of view, or simply speaking out of emotion, and referancing instances I feel to be "wrong" whether legal or not.  

Insurance also doesn’t protect you from misunderstandings, especially those made in writing and email.

Insurance also doesn’t protect you from misunderstandings, especially those made in writing and email.

I have no idea but you’re learning a fact about flips that I think a lot of people misunderstand.  

Insurance also doesn’t protect you from misunderstandings, especially those made in writing and email.

Insurance also doesn’t protect you from misunderstandings, especially those made in writing and email.

Insurance also doesn’t protect you from misunderstandings, especially those made in writing and email.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something.