I've listened to some "internet gurus" talk about being able to pay more for a house (through subject to) than its currently worth because of how much the backend value would be. 

I think we just found our next talking point in this month's OKC meetup! 

You should sit down with the tenant and talk this out, EYE BALL TO EYE BALL.  

That is actually still challenging enough, as many clients have told us - in hindsight they were glad we talked them out of a full-blown rehab.

If you are organized enough to forsee hang ups and talk with your GC about potential challenges on a regular basis, two brains are better than one.

If convicted of bank fraud you may be facing large fines of up to $1,000,000 and/or imprisonment of up to thirty years.Posted without comment.Okay, so one comment:Just because someone in your community says it's okay to do, better clear it with the feds first, or you may be talking with them later..This reminds me of a Subto in California that went bad and wasn't handled correctly. 

Working it backwards, I will need to talk with someone about an offer Im looking to make.

If you continue filing taxes jointly the income you realize from your separate property will still need to be explained and redacted, regardless of the type of entity holding the real estate.

I assume you mean that unemployment was 5.7% not 22.2% haha, but are you just talking Pittsburgh Metro, or Allegheny County?

We are really worried about lack of demand being a continued issue since our town may not even open our lake this summer due to storm contamination 🥲