We want to be perceived like a REIT, private equity or hedge fund would be, which in essence we are, albeit on a smaller scale.

They perceived an "opportunity" to increase their income, and were either unaware of the risks involved in doing so, or they thought they could fly under the radar like so many Lonnie Dealers do every day.The truth is, many seller-financiers in manufactured housing do similar things every day.

Too some it's not even about the money but getting over control on the perceived "rich landlord" because they see themselves as the victim being taken advantage of.You have to condition the tenant almost like a child so they know each time they will get the same response no matter what.

Another valuable skill is in ascertaining your perceived added value.

Both impact the perceived value of where they live.

Promoters will also get sick of shopping for a new portal each time they change deal type because the perceived risk of the portal is too high.

People don't cut what we perceive as their losses for all kinds of reasons.

It is VERY wise to have a PLAIN language disclosure in any real estate deal when the parties are perceived to have an imbalance of power.

I don't worry about getting stressed about rushing bc of real or perceived price appreciation.

On the other hand, if you are taking huge risks and incurring a large amount of debt you won't be able to easily repay if your real estate investments don't go exactly as planned, that might be perceived as financially irresponsible and cause the security clearance to be denied.