@Taylor L.I don't know if such saying exists but I'd agree to it.However, I have been investing internationally for a few years now and I totally disagree with your assertion that "investing in the US makes much more sense due to better pricing, cash flows and landlord-tenant laws" (which is can be partially true depending on which US state you compare with which foreign country and what strategy you follow).Making generalizations like that is generally very unhelpful, especially when they are based on discussions that you've had with one single person (as opposed to your own experience or that of many other people).

If you want to know what "freezing" the process entails on your financial requirements I suggest ask your conventional lender. 

When I first hear real estate professional, I thought it entailed needing to be a licensed realtor. 

Don't be afraid to assert your rights as a landlord.

BUT if these people are of quality, they'll want to see you can perform...and that probably entails closing a property or pay for a remodel.

, and I think the time has come for investors to become more assertive regarding their property rights.

So, what are these tips going to entail?

Extensive, permanent price controls never work out well for a national economy.You make several assertions above about what UBI will do:1. 

However, the LLC entails a number of time and cost expenses. 

Whatever the merits of Anderson's position might ultimately be, based upon the above I think its pretty clear that the State of California will assert that Ca Franchise tax is owed because you will be considered as conducting business in California on behalf of the LLCs.