data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02113/0211378be7925d4a55bae9f5e25e27cc34ae0a45" alt=""
5 October 2015 | 7 replies
It looks like I would have to deal with a ton of lien holders and the bank before I could get it and I figure the bank would get almost nothing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c66bb/c66bbb1e2bc523df203f3a8736c18254af6d365a" alt=""
14 October 2015 | 13 replies
., no heat in winter, no adequate plumbing) or something minor (the toilet roll holder fell off the wall).Gail
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a320/4a320d9a7b4f6b877c64e8c59503a63812e3f6bf" alt=""
9 October 2015 | 4 replies
If so, the owners would have to pay the liens with interest and fees as long as the timeframe for payment is still open, otherwise the certificate holder has first dibs.Good luck,Patricia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc34c/fc34c0c7282ceae98ea45ea8ee67aff6cbbf0c3f" alt=""
18 October 2015 | 11 replies
It seems to me there was/is a basic idea underlying the creation of the rules, that there should still be an opportunity to redeem in the event that the lien/deed holder chooses not to perform quickly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc6ba/bc6ba78c7b4b4761f5e8ff7cc3aaf7e3dd1953f6" alt=""
15 October 2015 | 10 replies
Originally posted by @Parker Cox:Thanks Karl, So if the second is washed away, in this scenario, there is a huge hit being taken on behalf of the banks, which I guess makes sense if they want to just rid themselves of the property but it still tells me that they know something I don't in terms of the actual value...Keep in mind the second lien holder knows when the first chooses to foreclose and has rights to protect their interests.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8d33/e8d33780930e0e2d8a46829d0e3850905ca36a30" alt=""
12 October 2015 | 4 replies
It gets it’s name because preferred equity holders have a preferred right to payments over regular equity holders.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25177/25177ecee5eeb348eb198ce2beb6a29d88b58f37" alt=""
13 October 2015 | 6 replies
In this priticular situation we will be flipping the home so I'm not as concerned about any due on sale clause the sellers mortgage holder might have but I will still go through the formality so I have multiple exit stratugies.
29 October 2016 | 4 replies
are you James Holder from the Twmple, Texas area?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6843/f6843caf22b4271083d6720ab1f851e1293b20bf" alt=""
15 March 2015 | 4 replies
The seller/note holder?