Blake, 205 Ariz. 236, 69 P.2d 7 (2003), the highest Court in our state had the following question concerning acceptable methods for a tenant to exercise an option to purchase leased property and the availability of equitable relief to excuse the tenant’s failure to timely exercise the option.In Andrews, the parties entered into a lease option that purportedly extended the option to purchase until a specific date.

If you've read any of these threads, you'll note that this is not a hard and fast RULE purported by this website, but a guideline that some of its members use to determine a property that is guaranteed to cash-flow.

Anthony - I'll again ask that you please point us to the place that these individuals are promoting these purported scams here on BiggerPockets.Thanks.James - I believe Aurthur was referring to the word "author"

I would like to suggest shutting the site down, but at least by having it, I'm aware of those who claim to have bulk reo's.If the site is shut down, then the bulk reo characters will reinvent themselves and purport some other worthless product (meaning there's no way in heck they can produce) with the same vigor.At least now....I know who you are, I know what you're doing!

I am not interested in anything that "pushes legality" if it is not completely straight and open and legal I will not do it.The California Civil Code states:[i](e) Whenever any equity purchaser purports to hold title as a result of any transaction in which the equity seller grants the residence in foreclosure by any instrument which purports to be an absolute conveyance and reserves or is given by the equity purchaser an option to repurchase such residence, the equity purchaser shall not cause any encumbrance or encumbrances to be placed on such property or grant any interest in such property to any other person without the written consent of the equity seller.

We probably need most of the things this bill purports to do.If you object to the once in 36 month limitation on owner financed sales, then ask your Senator to amend the bill to fully exempt property owners who sell their own property and carry back the financing with the property as collateral for the loan.Under the language of the bill, as I read it, you can still sell your own property and carry back the financing.

Thus, although the cases do not directly address the point, cancellations have been invalidated, notwithstanding the failure to procure an injunction prior to the end of the notice period, in cases where the claim was the notice understated the statutory time for cure, the purported contract for deed was in fact an equitable mortgage,26 there was no unpaid amount due, there was lack or insufficient service of process, or where there was a waiver of the cancellation by reason of acceptance of partial payment before (or after) the running of the notice period.Further, in Coddon v.

No money down is a myth purported by people that sell seminars.

Just came across floodfactor.com, a site the purports to give you (without having to look up FEMA materials in every zip code) what the flood risks are for a given property.

In my experience the best thing to do is contact the underwriter the agent is purportedly representing, they will be able to confirm or deny the agent's standing and make sure you are dealing with the actual agent.