I'm not fighting that, but just implying that while the two-day deadline is important, the act or receipt of the money by the agent, whenever that occurs, is more important.I've realized that the seller was within his rights, and was more frustrated with myself and the agent's behavior, or lack of professionalism.This isn't my 1,000th deal, would've been my second, and definitely not my full time job, so I'm still very much in a learning phase.

They take your money every month and when you finally put in a claim they are slow to act or try and say it was your wrong doing. 

(f) Arranging for a person to occupy a vacantresidential property is an act requiring a realestate license if the actor:(1) does not own the property or lease theproperty from its owner;(2) receives a valuable consideration; and(3) is not exempted from the requirementof a license by the Act, §1101.005.]Hope that answered your question and wish you the best of luck when you come back to San Antone.

Life style, leveraged assets and borrowing for depreciating assets, excess vehicles, toys and other financed properties says more about someone than how they speak, act or dress.Liabilities are viewed as obligations and contingent liabilities or debts they might incur if plans change.

When structured maliciously, the agent will pocket $5k in the first year... hence the need to make sure yours is structured right.

Report just the DOCUMENTED facts, no opinion, conjecture, hearsay, or malicious rants!

There is no central repository for bad actors, it's incumbent upon every investor to do their own due diligence on the sponsors they are considering doing business with.I once had a large family office do due diligence on me for months before investing.

The above conduct constituted 930 violations of R.C. 4735.02, which provides that no person, partnership, association, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or corporation shall advertise, act or assume to act as a real estate broker or real estate salesperson, without first being licensed under R.C.

The government had to act or every incumbent was going to be facing a losing battle during their next election.

It was deemed a malicious act by the judge and she decided against me personally, piercing the corporate veil.