
18 March 2019 | 30 replies
The murder was committed by the security guard the HOA had hired to patrol the community.

20 February 2019 | 1 reply
I’m in the national guard and had drill over the weekend, while we were sitting around waiting for whatever we were supposed to be doing there was guy talking at us about a bunch of different stuff.

15 February 2019 | 0 replies
This number represents active duty military, students in/at Air University, AF Reserve, National Guard, DOD civilians, military contractors, military retirees and all their family members in the greater Montgomery Metro Area.Both Maxwell and Maxwell-Gunter AFB play major roles in the Air Force’s and our entire military’s cyber defense and cyber strategies efforts, and the effects of this spill over the bases’ borders into the rest of the area.

21 May 2019 | 8 replies
I am transitioning out of the active duty AF into the reserves or guard and a flying contractor day job.

4 March 2019 | 18 replies
It's been rented ever since (12 years) to the Coast Guard.

21 November 2018 | 15 replies
As such that information must be appropriately guarded at all times.

20 November 2018 | 3 replies
Bare minimum I'd buy a bedbug kit and a can of Scotch Guard.

13 December 2018 | 38 replies
My goal is to continue to grow my wealth, and guard against a reduction of my wealth, so I will continue to invest in a low risk market like DC.

30 November 2018 | 18 replies
I was imagining that such a seller situation (asset owned by multiple parties of which the plan is but one) would be considered sufficient to avoid the prospects of self-dealing between the plan and the for the benefit of (FBO) party on the basis of the following rationale: the other current owner(s) of the asset would have every reason to sell the asset at or above market/appraised value and the other current buyer(s) of the asset would have every reason to purchase the asset at or below market/appraised value, thereby preventing any kind of backdoor retirement plan liquidation advantage for the FBO party since there would be checks and balances against such behavior.It seems to me that the IRS could help us side-step this whole discussion by explicitly providing for the option of such transactions in cases were such an asset is sold at appraised value, as rendered by a licensed (and qualified) third-party appraisal company, thereby proving that there is no unfair advantage realized by the FBO party vis a vis his or her retirement plan.In sum, it seems that if the purpose is to keep the fox (FBO party) from guarding the hen house (retirement plan), if the point is to prevent self-dealing, if the point is to prevent the sale of the asset at some below-market value which gives the FBO party a backdoor retirement plan liquidation opportunity, a requirement for the transaction to happen at appraised value would seem to be a perfect check and balance.
27 November 2018 | 2 replies
Since HELOCs have adjustable rates they will often catch people off guard when they adjust.