In most circumstances I agree that abatement is cost prohibitive, overkill, and frankly not necessary.

Running ductwork and all that is probably going to be cost prohibitive

That’s going to prohibit our real estate growth.

There is no state code that prohibits that; except if you put a clause in your lease.Our goal always is to attract and retain long term tenents that just coast for years on a mtm lease.

In general, if the property is owned by an LLC that is wholly owned by an IRA you will have two choices, but both have some risks.  1st option is that you can take 20% of the LLC as an in-kind distribution and the LLC will now now be owned by your IRA and you personally, which can be potentially be deemed a prohibited transaction under IRC 4975.

Perhaps as discussed air bnb but watch your condo bylaws probably prohibit short term rentals and you might get busted.Househack an option, rent out one room.i believe unless you bought your condo on a distressed sale it might have just held its value or slightly decreased in value due to market conditions.

Whixh to my understanding prohibits signs within a certain distance of others, certain zoning districts (I don't believe variances count, and I believe it had to have been zoned that way prior to 1959.)

That is not a prohibited action from Fannie/Freddie.  

Two weeks ago NorCal threw down with this:"The Oakland City Council on Tuesday approved an ordinance that would prohibit landlords from asking about a potential tenant's criminal history or rejecting them out of hand for having a record"This week, SoCal said, "Hold my kombucha..." and replied with the above.

Do you think this is a prohibited transaction?