ALTERATIONS.Tenant agrees not to alter the premises without prior written consent of Landlord.All changes made by Tenant must be reversible and property must be restored to original condition at end of tenancy, unless other arrangements have been made with Landlord.

An attorney can act as a broker and an attorney in the same transaction provided:1.) attorney can protect his client's legal interests even if attorney loses the commission should the transaction fail to close, and2.) attorney discloses the conflict of interest to the client, and3.) the client consents to the attorney acting as broker and attorney  In the original scenario, advising the seller not to sell at 1/5 market value, and helping him get a better deal is certainly not an ethical violation.  

With TIC interests, nearly every single one I have ever seen has only pledged TIC interest as collateral (which is one of the reasons lenders won't do it anymore) and not a mortgage, unless all TIC members agree and sign consents or the actual mortgage.

So, the Landloard (me) is left with the situation of not wanting to wrongfully and illegally remove Tenant B from the lease without Tenant B's knowledge or consent, but the Landlord cannot get a hold of Tenant B to discuss the matter.As far as I can tell, the only way to really confirm if Tenant B no longer lives at the premises would be to stake the place out for hours on end unless I can speak directly with said Tenant which again, is proving quite difficult.I know there are "abandonment" clauses in Mass. rental laws, but given the unique circumstances, I'm not sure how those apply to my company being able to remove Tenant B from the lease without written notice to quit or consent from that Tenant them self.  

Hi @Teddy Johnson,Revocable living trust plus LLC is actually a really good question, something I haven't given thought to, and something I've never seen done or attempted.

I'm putting an offer (wife consent first) on the home.

I had an early termination consent that I gave to a tenant two years ago because he got a job in another state and he ended up paying me for the remainder of the term upfront.

•Our Manager may, without shareholder consent unless otherwise required by law, determine that we should merge or consolidate through a roll-up or other similar transaction involving other entities, including entities affiliated with our Manager, into or with such other entities.The bolded item ^^ above (emphasis mine) is Waldo to me:It is clearly disclosed in the documents.  

It's not fair dealing.A note is a bi-lateral contract, it requires consent of the lender to assign the note or any of the collateral held, much like laying to waste of any collateral.

But with that being said I would definitely ask for more than a $2500 that he is willing to consent.