Assembly Bill 1771, also known as the California Housing Speculation Act, aims to change real estate tax policy to discourage investors from quickly reselling properties like single-family homes.Under the proposed bill, an additional 25% tax would be imposed on the gain from the sale of a qualified asset (including homes) within three years of the previous sale.The tax reduction is dependent on the number of years passed since the initial purchase of the qualified asset, ranging from a 20% reduction for sales occurring between 3.01 to 4 years to a 100% reduction for sales occurring more than seven years after the initial purchase.The revenues generated by this tax increase would be deposited into the Speculation Recapture Community Reinvestment Fund, which aims to support affordable housing, local governments, schools, and infrastructure projects.The bill is introduced by Assembly Member Ward, and the proposed tax changes would take effect from January 1, 2023.Assembly Member Ward argues that short-term investors in the market, including fix and flip investors, contribute to rising housing prices, limiting opportunities for Californians to purchase homes.While the bill may discourage short-term speculative transactions, it is worth noting that California's tax laws still provide certain advantages for investors, including unlimited tax write-offs and depreciation benefits.The bill is subject to legislative approval, and Assembly Member Ward will speak publicly about the bill at the San Diego County Administration Center on a specified date.Please note that this is a simplified summary of the bill and its potential impact on fix and flip investors.

Any recommendations for the best affordable Insurance for Landlords (rental properties)I currently have ASI (American Strategic Insurance) a Progressive company, but I am wondering what others have found to be affordable. 

SB 567 clarifies that a tenant is not required to vacate the unit on any days where they could continue living there without violating health, safety, and habitability codes and laws.

If the tenant can't afford it, he can look for another rental that is within his price range.

The question is can you afford to pay that extra amount? 

Can you afford to move to 75% LTV instead? 

This first-of-its-kind project addresses California’s housing shortage by repurposing an underutilized site into a vibrant residential and retail space.Of the 800 units, 180 will be affordable housing, with amenities including a rooftop pool and fitness center.

Here’s why you should consider investing in this growing market:Affordable LandFlorence offers affordable land compared to larger markets, allowing investors to secure property at lower prices with strong potential for appreciation as the area develops.High Demand for New HomesThe city’s growing population is driving demand for new construction.

Almost all of my tenants won’t ever be able to afford or qualify to buy a house.

And if that happens, they will be able to afford their new share of the rent. $950 income for the entire month seems quite low and probably justifies your concern.