My goal in understanding the $xx per door was to properly interpret the 50% rule.

The problem was the MLOs and Mortgage Brokers did not know what they were doing to follow that narrow methodology so the whole transaction could have been interpreted as an "ongoing criminal conspiracy" which could have invoked the RICCO statutes.

text can be challenging to interpret, but i would basically say.thanks for the heads up. what is the resaon for being late?

This could reasonably be argued in court, but seek your own legal cousel before interpreting what I just said.Another useful question on my application reads "Have you ever been evicted?".  

Attorneys will tell you it depends on how a judge feels that day and how they interpret the evidence and the laws.

When I lived in Seattle, I worked as an independent contractor, self-employed sign language interpreter.

Since @Ed B. has not seen fit to clarify what could be interpreted as his libelous description of me "screwing the buying public" and engaging in a "total scam", and I want to offer the following comments:These are the facts:In Massachusetts - and as far as I know, every other state - a client's real estate agent, whether buyer's or seller's agent, is required both by law and by ethics to represent the client's best interests. 

If you start in on internet research, you could find a heck of a lot of numbers and info that you won't necessarily know how to interpret.

Also, development can be interpreted a couple of different ways.

Again, not telling you how to run your business, but what is your plan for when you buy a property and later the family or DSHS interprets that transaction as possible elder abuse and financial exploitation because the seller was incapacitated, the deal was private and no REI professionals were involved?