Then the occupant would be able to defend against the automatic writ of possession (even when they didn't do what they were required to do), and we would be forced to institute a whole new eviction action.

haha, I didn't think anyone posted this and I was about to start a new thread.Yes, realtors just seem to be sheep in that blog post and agree with the author without any actual facts,cases etc.Personally, I'm one of the few who defend it but it does fall on deaf ears so I just gave it up because they sure must be happy with their 3% lol

I have followed cases with the same complaints (many in the Public Records Act cases where LNI refused stubbornly to give up records) but the problem is that LNI is defended by the Attorney Generals office.

A judge once told me that they've done their job if both the plaintiff and defendant in a civil suit walks out of there pissed off.

During your initial research of the property list you should look for the county civil court records to see if any of the above have been named as defendants in the suit to foreclose, that is quick and can easily be done from home (in my county at least).  

Do you really think your brokers E & O insurance will pay to defend you, they will defend your broker but ultimately you are the one that is responsible.

Hi Elizabeth - yes you are right but here's the "conundrum"; I don't want to pay high taxes and write off everything I can, that I can defend......which means the bottom line looks a lot different than the top line.

What are the costs to mount the lawsuit and how successful are they against the defendant.

Realtors.Needless to say, I was just defending that stance for all investors - new & old, when it comes to the mentality of what you "can" vs "can't" do - i.e.

But we can't go around defending ourselves by saying that our broker said to just sign it.