They're not held to peer review or other scientific standards, and like many editorials they often have an angle that they are promoting.

Here's a link about the wealthy leaving (just for you Eddie).http://www.dailynews.com/editorial/ci_11265873High taxes; socialism, free everything for illegals; big time welfare; and the "spread the wealth" philosophy don't seem to be the path to more run-away appreciation in California!

This article is pretty editorialized, but it shows the continuing issues surrounding emotional support animals.https://www.sltrib.com/news/po...

http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/hud-t...The Obama administration has just made it easier for felons to move in next door.

http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/hud-t...

The way I see it, you paid for him to create the content of that document, not the actual document itself.I would just open the document in your PDF reader, hilite the whole document and copy it into Word, do your own editing, formatting, then do a Save As PDF again.If you want to include fillable fields, like names, addresses, dates, then you will need the full version of Adobe, or any of the third party editor.  I

Originally posted by @Antoine Martel:Originally posted by @Andrew Syrios:Kansas City is making a run for HQ2 and that's who I am pulling for. http://www.kansascity.com/opinion/editorials/article172157917.html That would be amazing and I heard that KC was one of the top choices for them.  

:-]Back to the reason why being on the ground in the area you invest can be beneficial.The LA Times isn't saying anything different... it actually sounds much worse from their viewhttp://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-ho...

For those of you unaware of Florissant's severe overreaching and trampling of rights, here is an article regarding it: http://www.stltoday.com/opinion/editorial/editoria...I did hear a lawsuit was in progress against the city of Florissant.