All I was told was that funding dried up.

The only thing Im not so sure about is the communal large bottles of shampoo and conditioner left in the shower.

Because the entity you could go after, who has little capital to go after, sure you could put them out of business, and wouldn't ya know it 24hrs later that property is now under a new same/similar enhanced NNN lease arrangement to a new separate operational party who took over for the now bankrupt entity.And what attorney is going to burn through thousands of hours, trying to go after "dry wells"? 

Summer is dry here and fires are a real concern so I say nope.We have a $500 security deposit and it is clear that I will keep it if you smoke anywhere on the property.

My only experience is with non-payment of rent, and to me that's very cut and dry.

You'll also notice when they are bid side trying to own collectively 1-2 million bitcoin, liquidity is going to dry up and it'll block trade.

As you can imagine capital starts drying up quickly "trapping" 20% into each unit.

All the remediation company does is stop the leak/repair the plumbing, remove any wet materials, dry everything out with big fans and then replace whatever needed to be removed.

I wouldn't want the landlord living in my rental with all my belongings, using all my spicy mustard or my V05 Extra Body Shampoo.

Does providing complementally k-cups/teas, popcorn, spices, toiletry essentials (toothbrushes, floss, bath wash, shampoo, conditioner, soap, paper products, makeup remover, laundry detergent, firewood with firestarters for the fireplace and firepit constitute as substantial services?