There's next to nada, anew... aside from the latest 'regs' to stem the tide of the 'sheeple,' awakening... or upsetting their apple carts, like bulls in their China closets... or derivatives, default swaps and crypto currencies.

Have a conversation with them first and get an idea of where the cost is/was derived.

Is the difference sufficient enough deriving from the Maximum allowable offer for the end buyer?

I just bought me first property and I'm hoping over time she sees the benefits we derive from it and starts investing at a much younger age than I did.

I'm also not seeing how utilities are factored into expenses, if some portion of the expenses were derived from *actuals*, etc.

No savvy owner is going to have a dialogue about value being derived from an assessed value.

If I earn self-employment income next year but the self-employment income is derived from a completely different source than the income I have earned this year, does that have any bearing on my Solo 401k account or status?

Getting it Sold at the inflated List Price is another question.My guess is - you are looking at Values derived from "Taxing District" data.

Most retail buyers looking for their primary residence could care less what cash flow the property could produce as a rental, and this can actually benefit you on the sales side since a retail buyer will likely be willing to pay more for the property than a typical investor would.However, it is still possible to do "forced appreciation" on a single family home ... if you buy a property well and then remodel in such a way that the remodel brings it up to the standard of the rest of the neighborhood and the resulting after repair value (ARV) increases the property value more than the remodel cost, then you have earned a profit (though the profit may not be realized until you sell or refinance) ... this is how professional flippers derive their profits, but the same exact process can be used by buy and hold investors.

It won't be derivatives on the secondary market with questions about who actually owns the overly inflated note, this time.