BTW, if they own the house - they would pay for these broken windows and other damagesI agree with this conclusion.

In conclusion, keeping ownership stakes consistent is essential for rewarding the partner who took a higher risk and for encouraging everyone to stay equally invested in the success of the business.

While I agree with the conclusion you came to, this post comes off as a search for confirmation.

I am told that in '77', many said everything was going to end, as the Vietnam calamity came to it's conclusion.

Typically in a judicial state it will take a year plus to foreclose, the conclusion of the foreclosure is the property goes to auctionIn a non judicial state there is typically a deed of trust and the trustee will auction off the propertyIn todays economic environment (we buy notes so we have a pretty good pulse on what’s going on), foreclosures are rare and the properties being foreclosed upon mine as well be knocked down.Why do I say that?

If you'd like to  PM me and I'll ask you some more conclusion questions and give you some more information on protecting yourself.You have a lot of options.

If he was serious about health, re-location, etc, he would sell it for cash and move on.I agree with your premise but not the conclusion.

I think we can all agree that when we look at the true inflation rate at the grocery store and gas station we can come to the conclusion that someone may be lying about the official inflation rate.

Also, just like with IRS publications and investor podcasts, it's very easy to make a wrong conclusion by taking one paragraph out of this guide.

With the numbers people throw at me, in my area the TLDR/conclusion is most often that ADUs do not seem to make sense to build purely from a resale value perspective.