The government has no cap and increases the money supply by 40% but feels it's appropriate to cap something that was created by their actions/decisions.

We explained to her she could find someone to sub-lease with our approval but one way or another she was on the hook for rental payments through the end of her lease and she seemed unaffected by potential legal action if a suitable sublease was not found.Anyone have any advice on this situation?  

It's almost funny that Sief is now running 'TechVestor' after defrauding us and there hasnt been any legal action against him (we tried, trust me).

To you point, when the payoff timeline is so compressed, it’s really not an interest rate sensitive loan.

The model is super sensitive to both.

We can give you some starting pointers, but you can't really avoid engaging with your own advisors for an actual plan of action.1.

Conventus pushes everything on Shellpoint.Isn't conventus responsible for the actions of their agent. 

It may seem pointless but I've had a number of dialogues with an SEC Investigator who promises they ARE interested and all the information accumulates until they get the magic puzzle piece which allows them to take action. 

So I advocate home ownership as the first step.The most important thing is action.  

I currently have 30K cash from the cash out refi I did on another property as well that could serve as a DP.I would love to hear thoughts on what the best course of action would be to get more cash flowing into the portfolio.